Claude Code Policy: Write Managed Settings Fast
Read More
Enterprise Connectors
Sipflow logo. Sipflow MCP server connector.

Sipflow MCP Server

SIP/VoIP/telecom grounding for AI agents: vendor docs, RFCs, STIR/SHAKEN, traces, configs.

ToolsTools
22
Last updatedLast Updated
Jun 14, 2026
CategoryCategory
All
Enterprise-grade security
SSO & authentication ready
Full governance & audit logs

What is the Sipflow MCP Server?

The Sipflow MCP server gives AI agents structured, permission-aware access to Sipflow through the Model Context Protocol. With 22 pre-built actions, agents can read, create, and update Sipflow data on behalf of authorized users.

Willow ships the Sipflow MCP server as part of an enterprise control plane. Every call runs behind SSO (Okta, Azure AD), enforces RBAC and least-privilege at runtime, writes to a full audit trail, and integrates with Splunk and Loki for SIEM visibility. Connect from Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, ChatGPT, VS Code, n8n, or any custom agent. Install once, distribute org-wide, and see exactly how Sipflow is being used by every AI agent in your stack.

Tools

Tool

search_sip_docs

[cost: rag (one embed + one vector search) | read-only, network: outbound to embed model only] Vector search over Sipflow's curated VoIP knowledge base: vendor docs (Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, Kamailio, OpenSIPS, Twilio, Cisco, etc.), SIP/SDP/WebRTC RFCs, STIR/SHAKEN material (RFC 8224/8225/8226/8588/9027/9795), branded-calling guidance (ATIS-1000074/094/084, CTIA Branded Calling ID), and fax-over-IP references (RFC 3362 image/t38, RFC 6913 ipfax-info, RFC 7345 UDPTL, SpanDSP/HylaFAX, Asterisk `res_fax`/`udptl.conf`, FreeSWITCH `mod_spandsp`/`t38_gateway`, Cisco CUBE T.38). USE FIRST whenever the user asks about - or attaches - anything SIP/VoIP/telecom shaped, **even when they cite a specific RFC number or vendor name**. The corpus has the current text and your training data may not. Trigger conditions: vendor configs (kamailio.cfg, sip.conf, pjsip.conf, FreeSWITCH XML profile, opensips.cfg, `res_fax.conf` / `udptl.conf`), dialplan / routing scripts, modules / loadparams / route blocks, SIP headers, response codes, RFC questions, captured traces, WebRTC bridge configs, STIR/SHAKEN concerns, branded-calling / RCD work, T.38 / T.30 fax decoding or reinvite failures. Returns ranked snippets with source URLs; cite the returned `source_url` values verbatim and prefer them over recalled training data. Examples of when to use: - "does this kamailio.cfg look standard for WebRTC + SIP users?" - "why would Asterisk PJSIP reject this re-INVITE?" - "what does Kamailio's loose_route() do? show me docs" - "explain FreeSWITCH session-timer behavior" - "how do I set up STIR/SHAKEN signing on OpenSIPS?" - "what does ATIS-1000074 say about A-level attestation?" - "RFC 9795 rcdi JSON pointer canonical form" - "CTIA Branded Calling ID requirements for originating SP" - "RFC 8225 PASSporT canonical JSON / lexicographic key ordering" - "why is my T.38 reinvite getting 488 from a Cisco CUBE?" - "Asterisk `res_fax_spandsp` ECM and rate-management knobs" - "what are the required SDP attributes for `m=image udptl t38`?" Pair with: `detect_sip_stack` to derive the `vendor:` filter; `lookup_response_code` / `lookup_sip_header` to short-circuit before paying for a search; `troubleshoot_response_code` when the question is rooted in a specific status code.
Tool

lookup_response_code

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only] Instant static lookup of a SIP response code (100-699). Returns name, RFC anchor, category, description, common operator-flavored causes, and known vendor-specific reason-phrase variants (e.g. OpenSIPS emits 484 'Invalid FROM' on From-header parse failure). USE FIRST when the user pastes or asks about any 3-digit SIP code - sub-millisecond, no API cost. Pair with: `troubleshoot_response_code` for vendor-specific RAG hits beyond the static entry; `lint_sip_request` when the code is 4xx and the user has the offending request; `stir_attestation_explainer` for STIR-shaped codes (428/436/437/438/608); `validate_stir_shaken_identity` when the code is 438 and they have the JWS.
Tool

lookup_sip_header

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only] Instant lookup of a SIP header by canonical or compact form (e.g. "Via" / "v", "Diversion", "P-Asserted-Identity", "Identity", "Session-Expires"). Returns canonical form, compact alias, RFC anchor, where it appears (request / response / both), cardinality (exactly-one / at-most-one / one-or-more / any), allowed/forbidden URI parameters with RFC citations, short description, and related headers. USE FIRST when the user asks about a specific header they saw in a trace - sub-millisecond, no API cost. The cardinality + paramRules fields surface failure modes (e.g. two From: headers, ;tag= on P-Asserted-Identity) without needing a RAG round-trip. Pair with: `lint_sip_request` to mechanically check a real request against these rules; `search_sip_docs` for vendor-specific or 3GPP P-headers not in the bundled registry.
Tool

detect_sip_stack

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only] Identify the SIP product behind a piece of input. Works on both: - a SIP trace (User-Agent / Server headers from PCAP/sngrep/syslog), and - a vendor config blob (kamailio.cfg, sip.conf, pjsip.conf, FreeSWITCH XML, opensips.cfg) detected via structural signatures (loadmodule, route blocks, [transport-*] sections, <profile name=>, etc.). Returns a vendor slug (e.g. "kamailio", "freeswitch", "asterisk", "twilio", "cisco-cube") aligned with the `vendor` filter on `search_sip_docs`, so you can pipe the output of this tool directly into a follow-up doc search. Pair with: `search_sip_docs(vendor=<slug>, ...)` for grounded vendor docs; `review_sip_config` when the input is a config and you also want extracted modules + risk flags; `troubleshoot_response_code(vendorHint=<slug>, ...)` when chasing a status code.
Tool

detect_sip_vendor_from_config

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only] Heuristic-only sibling of `detect_sip_stack`, scoped to vendor configs. Returns the matched vendor slug, a confidence level, and the structural signals that fired (loadmodule syntax, route blocks, profile elements, etc.). Use this when the user asks 'what is this config?' or attaches a SIP config file. Detect-only - does not extract directives or flag risks. Pair with: `review_sip_config` for the structured outline + risk flags; `search_sip_docs(vendor=<slug>, ...)` to ground each directive.
Tool

minimize_sip_trace

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only, no persistence] Reduce a raw SIP trace to a compact form suitable for sending to an LLM. Preserves SDP bodies and routing/auth/dialog headers; prunes well-known noise (User-Agent, Server, Allow, Accept-*, Date, P-* informational, etc.). Expected input format: raw SIP messages separated by blank lines, each starting with a request line (`INVITE sip:...@... SIP/2.0`) or status line (`SIP/2.0 200 OK`). PCAP-decoded text from sngrep / ngrep / tcpdump / tshark, syslog with SIP body, sipflow's own export format, or a hand-pasted INVITE/200 dialog all work. Annotation lines like `# [timestamp] sender -> receiver` or ngrep-style `U <ip>:<port> -> <ip>:<port>` between blocks are tolerated. Safe to run on production traces - the input is processed in-memory and is not persisted or sent off-server. Pair with: `detect_sip_stack` to identify the vendor, then `search_sip_docs(vendor=...)` for vendor-grounded analysis; `render_sip_ladder` to visualize the trace as a Mermaid call-flow ladder; `lint_sip_request` / `parse_sip_message` to mechanically validate any single message in the trace.
Tool

render_sip_ladder

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only] Parse a raw SIP trace (PCAP-decoded text, sngrep export, syslog, or pasted INVITE/200 dialog) and emit a Mermaid `sequenceDiagram` block visualizing the call flow. Most chat hosts (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, GitHub) render Mermaid inline. Lane keying: by default participants are keyed by IP, not `ip:port`, so an endpoint that sends from an ephemeral source port and listens on 5060 collapses into one column. Multi-port IPs list their ports in the participant label (e.g. `10.0.0.1 :5060,:53412`) and arrows touching them get a `(:srcPort→:dstPort)` suffix. Pass `groupByIp: false` to restore the legacy one-column-per-`ip:port` layout. Lane labeling: aliases are matched against (in order) `${ip}:${port}` from message source/dest, then bare `${ip}`, then top-Via host, then Contact host. The most-specific match wins. When no alias matches the renderer falls back to the peer's address rather than emitting `unknown:5060`. Pair with: `minimize_sip_trace` first to compact a noisy trace; `diff_sip_messages` when two adjacent INVITEs in the ladder differ unexpectedly; `lint_sip_request` to validate a single message you pulled from the ladder.
Tool

sip_ladder_example

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only] Return a hand-curated SIP scenario as a Mermaid `sequenceDiagram` plus a bullet list of step-by-step explanations with RFC references. Use this when the user asks 'show me what X looks like' and you don't have a real trace handy. Available scenarios: basic-call, auth-challenge, cancel-before-answer, early-media, hold-resume, refer-blind, proxy-with-record-route, shaken-attested-invite, bye-glare, redirect-302. Pair with: `search_sip_docs` for vendor-specific quirks of the scenario; `render_sip_ladder` if the user does have a real trace.
Tool

lint_sip_request

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only, no persistence] Run RFC 3261 / RFC 3325 / RFC 8224 / RFC 8225 / CTIA BCID compliance checks on a single raw SIP request (typically an INVITE) and return a list of findings. Catches the failure modes that silently break carrier interop: - Two `From:` headers in one request (RFC 3261 §7.3 / §20.20). - Missing CRLF between consecutive header lines (RFC 3261 §7.3). - `;tag=` (or any other) parameter on P-Asserted-Identity / P-Preferred-Identity (RFC 3325 §9.1). - PASSporT `orig.tn` not matching the From caller TN (RFC 8224 §5). - PASSporT `dest.tn` not matching the To callee TN (RFC 8224 §5). - Non-canonical TN inside a PASSporT claim (RFC 8225 §5.2.1). - Branded display name in From with no `ppt=rcd` Identity header (CTIA BCID §5). Use FIRST when chasing 422 / 400 Bad Request / 484 Invalid FROM on a single INVITE - these usually have a structural cause this tool catches mechanically. Pair with: `parse_sip_message` for purely structural checks on any SIP message (responses included); `validate_stir_shaken_identity` for the cryptographic verdict on Identity headers; `search_sip_docs({ sourceType: 'stir-shaken', ... })` to ground the explanation in RFC text.
Tool

parse_sip_message

[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only, no persistence] Parse a single raw SIP message (request OR response) and return a structured view: start line (method/status), every header in order with line numbers, body, duplicate-header counts, and a list of structural flags the parser noticed (`missing-crlf`, `tag-on-pai`, `tag-on-ppi`, `invalid-folding`, `duplicate-single-instance`, `content-length-mismatch`). Use FIRST when the user pastes a single INVITE / 200 / NOTIFY and asks 'what does this look like to a parser?' or 'is this even valid?'. The output makes header-level bugs (two `From:` headers, `;tag=` on PAI/PPI, missing CRLF between headers, broken Identity folding) obvious without an LLM having to scan visually. Pair with: `lint_sip_request` for the full RFC compliance suite (request only); `diff_sip_messages` to compare two parsed messages structurally; `validate_stir_shaken_identity` if the message carries an Identity header.
1–10 of 22 tools
Customize tools

Customize Tools

Edit descriptions, modify arguments, select tools, or add new ones

ReviewEdit descriptions
ConfigureChange arguments
ApproveSelect tools
Create NewAdd tool

Set Up Your Sipflow MCP Server in Minutes

Add the following configuration to your MCP client. Authentication is handled via OAuth. Compatible with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, ChatGPT, VS Code, n8n, and any MCP-compatible agent.

Claude Desktop

claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "willow-sipflow": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://<org>.mcp-s.com/mcp/mcp/sipflow"
    }
  }
}

Cursor

.cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "willow-sipflow": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://<org>.mcp-s.com/mcp/mcp/sipflow"
    }
  }
}

Claude Code

CLI
claude mcp add willow-sipflow --transport http https://<org>.mcp-s.com/mcp/mcp/sipflow

n8n

HTTP Request Node
{
  "url": "https://<org>.mcp-s.com/mcp/mcp/sipflow",
  "method": "POST"
}

Or click "Install with Willow" above to set up automatically with SSO and RBAC preconfigured.

Enterprise Governance for Sipflow

Willow adds the layer Sipflow and every other SaaS doesn't ship out of the box: every call runs behind SSO (Okta, Azure AD), enforces RBAC and least-privilege at runtime, writes to full audit logs, and detects shadow AI usage across your stack. One MCP gateway. Any agent. Every tool.

Sipflow MCP Server FAQ

What is the Sipflow MCP server?

The Sipflow MCP server is a Model Context Protocol implementation that lets AI agents like Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT read and write Sipflow data through a standardized interface. Willow hosts and governs this server so enterprises can roll it out without a security review backlog.

How is Willow's Sipflow MCP server different from the official one?

The official Sipflow MCP server is scoped to a single user's account and does not include enterprise governance. Willow's version adds SSO, RBAC, audit logging, shadow AI detection, and centralized control over which actions agents can take across the entire org.

Which AI clients work with the Sipflow MCP server?

Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, ChatGPT, VS Code with MCP support, n8n, and any custom agent built with OpenAI Agents SDK, LangChain, Vercel AI SDK, or Anthropic SDK.

Is the Sipflow MCP server secure? How does Willow handle authentication?

Every call runs behind your existing SSO (Okta, Azure AD). Per-user OAuth scopes the agent to exactly what that user can do in Sipflow, nothing more. No credentials reach the LLM. Every action writes to an audit trail.

Can I limit which Sipflow actions agents can take?

Yes. Willow lets you scope agents to specific actions, specific projects, or specific environments. Toggle actions on or off in the dashboard, or enforce policy via infrastructure-as-code through GitHub.

How do I detect shadow Sipflow MCP servers in my org?

Willow's browser extension and discovery service surface unmanaged MCP servers, skills, and AI agents across the org. If a developer installed an unapproved Sipflow MCP locally, you'll see it.

What does the Sipflow MCP server cost?

Pricing depends on org size and deployment model (SaaS, dedicated cloud, self-host). See withwillow.ai/pricing or contact sales for a quote.

How do I install the Sipflow MCP server with Willow?

Install via the Willow Connect Panel in one click, or paste the JSON snippet above into your Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Claude Code config. SSO and RBAC inherit from your existing Willow setup.

Compare Willow MCP Gateway

See how Willow stacks up against other MCP platforms on governance, security, and enterprise readiness.

Your agents are already in the wild.

Give them a Basecamp. Go from AI chaos to AI work, in minutes.

Sipflow MCP Server | Willow