Case Study
How Wix scaled Al-native work to 5,000 employees with Willow
Read More
MCP Gateways

Willow vs MCP Manager

Willow finds local AI clients, MCP settings, skills, and browser activity before employees register them. Choose MCP Manager only when approved MCP traffic needs automatic schema-change blocking or protocol-specific protection.

TL;DR

Willow finds local AI clients, MCP settings, skills, and browser activity before employees register them. Choose MCP Manager only when approved MCP traffic needs automatic schema-change blocking or protocol-specific protection.

Both tools govern AI, but they start in different places. Willow starts with the AI clients and settings IT does not know about yet. MCP Manager starts with the MCP connections already brought under management. The right choice depends on which problem you have first.

  • Choose Willow when you need to find AI that employees adopted without registering it, then govern that use across devices, browsers, clients, tools, skills, bots, and agents.
  • Why Willow fits: Willow finds named local AI settings, clients, skill files, and agent instructions on managed macOS and Windows devices. IT does not need employees to register each one first.
  • Choose MCP Manager only when automatic MCP schema-change blocking or protocol-specific protection for approved connections defines the project.

At a glance

Willow finds supported AI use across managed devices and browsers, then lets IT govern identities, policies, MCP access, skills, plugins, and agents.

MCP Manager places registered remote, managed, and workstation MCP servers behind one gateway with identity, tool controls, content rules, and audit logs.

The core difference

Willow finds employee AI before registration. MCP Manager secures approved MCP connections. Willow's job begins with discovery, the AI nobody told IT about. MCP Manager's job begins once a connection is already approved and routed through its gateway.

‍

Compare the controls your team needs first

Criteria Willow MCP Manager
Main job Find and govern employee AI across devices, browsers, identities, MCP access, skills, plugins, and agents Secure and monitor MCP servers and tool calls routed through its gateway
Before registration Finds supported local MCP configurations, installed AI clients, skills, and agent instruction files Relies on client allowlists, MDM or EDR, and administrators routing approved connections through its gateway
Local MCP servers Discovers local configurations and applies device policies; governed calls can use Willow's gateway Enterprise runs registered STDIO servers through an encrypted workstation tunnel
MCP tool changes Allow, warn, or block rules for discovered MCP servers and skills, plus build-time guards that can stop publication Pins approved definitions and automatically blocks changed tools until re-approved
Browser AI Prompt Guard (beta) can block or redact prompts and attachments on supported sites; Claude Guard controls Claude-in-Chrome actions Does not control browser AI outside MCP calls
Identity SSO, SCIM, groups, machine users, background agents, owners, and credential rotation Teams, roles, per-user or shared server identities, and break-glass controls; SSO and SCIM require Enterprise
Pricing Free for up to 5 users and 5 integrations with proxy MCP support; contact Willow for Premium and Enterprise Self-serve plans at $135, $400, and $668 per month; 10, 30, or 50 servers and 14, 30, or 90 days of retention; contact sales for Enterprise
Compliance SOC 2 Type II; GDPR-aligned Operated by Usercentrics, which is SOC 2 Type II certified; Enterprise includes a BAA and HIPAA-compliant logging

‍

Where Willow leads: find the AI employees adopted without asking IT

Willow finds AI on managed devices and in supported browsers, including tools that never reached an approved gateway.

  • Find local AI automatically. Discover supported MCP configurations, installed AI clients, skills, Cursor rules, CLAUDE.md, and AGENTS.md files on managed macOS and Windows devices.
  • Apply policy outside MCP calls. Prompt Guard beta can block or redact prompts and attachments on supported web AI sites. Claude Guard can pause Claude-in-Chrome actions before the browser sends them. IT can push these controls through existing device-management tools.
  • Manage skills, plugins, and agents. Publish governed skills, toolkits, and plugins. Give machine users and background agents named owners, scoped access, credentials, and rotation.
  • Enforce model budgets. In supported clients, Usage Hooks can stop prompts after a model reaches its monthly budget. Willow also provides token analytics and model policies.

When to choose MCP Manager

Choose MCP Manager only when schema-change blocking leads the project, or when protocol-specific protection for approved connections defines it.

  • Stop changed tool definitions. It stores the approved schema and can block updated tools until an administrator reviews and approves them again.
  • Apply named MCP protections. MCP Manager has controls for rug pulls, tool poisoning, anti-mimicry, server spoofing, cross-server shadowing, and prompt injection.

These are real strengths for a team whose entire project is hardening a set of connections that are already approved and routed through a gateway. If that is the whole scope, MCP Manager fits. If you first need to find the AI that never reached a gateway, that is where Willow starts.

Proven at enterprise scale

"We are six to ten months ahead of most companies in AI adoption. More code to production, fewer incidents, real outcomes. Willow is what made it possible to move that fast without slowing down our security posture."Asaf Yonay, Head of AI Core, Wix

  • ~5,000 weekly active users at Wix
  • ~600 governed tools and MCPs
  • 2M+ governed tool calls each week

Bottom line

Willow finds and governs employee AI across devices, browsers, clients, identities, tools, skills, and agents. MCP Manager specializes in protecting approved MCP connections.

Use Willow when IT must first find the AI employees adopted without approval. Choose MCP Manager only when schema-change blocking or protocol-specific MCP protection decides the purchase.

FAQs

What is the main difference between Willow and MCP Manager?

Willow finds and governs employee AI across devices, browsers, clients, identities, tools, skills, bots, and agents. MCP Manager focuses on MCP schema changes, protocol attacks, and approved local-server tunnels.

Which product finds AI that employees did not register with IT?

Willow finds supported local AI clients, MCP settings, skill files, and agent instructions on managed macOS and Windows devices. MCP Manager starts with approved MCP connections already sent through managed routes.

When should I choose Willow?

When you need to find AI that employees adopted without registering it, then govern that use across devices, browsers, clients, tools, skills, bots, and agents.

When should I choose MCP Manager?

Choose MCP Manager only when automatic MCP schema-change blocking or protocol-specific protection for approved connections defines the project.

Table of contents

    Background Agents in the Enterprise

    Most teams can spin up an agent. Few can deploy one their security team signs off on. Here's the framework that does both.

    Willow vs Natoma

    Two managed platforms for org-wide agent access. Compare MCP deployment, role-based tool access, shadow AI detection depth, and deployment options from SaaS to air-gapped.

    MCP Gateway
    Alternative

    Willow vs Airia

    Airia routes every AI request through one governed gateway of approved models and tools. Willow scopes tool access per user and per task, and finds the AI that bypasses the gateway entirely.

    AI Gateway
    Alternative

    Willow vs MCP Manager

    MCP Manager by Usercentrics gives IT a private MCP registry, RBAC and audit logs. Willow adds discovery of the MCPs nobody registered, employee self-service and air-gapped deployment.

    MCP Gateway
    Alternative

    Your agents are already in the wild.

    Give them a Basecamp. Go from AI chaos to AI work, in minutes.