Case Study
How Wix scaled Al-native work to 5,000 employees with Willow
Read More
Identity & Access

Willow vs CyberArk

CyberArk (Idira) manages privileged agent identities and just-in-time access. Willow governs employee AI tools with MCP discovery, approved capabilities, device policies, and runtime approvals.

TL;DR
  • Willow governs the AI tools employees use every day: it discovers local MCP servers, skills and plugins, enforces device policy, distributes an approved catalog through company groups and requires approval before selected tool calls.
  • CyberArk, now part of Palo Alto Networks and rebranded Idira, extends privileged access management to AI agents. Idira Secure AI Agents discovers agents, brokers just-in-time access through its Agent Identity Broker and enforces policies on MCP tools.
  • Choose Willow to govern employee AI adoption end to end. Consider Idira when the priority is extending an existing CyberArk privilege program to agents that reach privileged infrastructure.

‍

An engineering organization rolls out Claude Code, Cursor and a set of internal agents. Most of the risk is not a rogue super-admin. It is the everyday drift: an MCP server added from a public repository, a skill copied from a forum, a write tool exposed when read access was enough. Security needs to see that drift on every laptop, steer people toward approved tools and stop consequential calls until someone approves them.

Willow was built for that work. It discovers local MCP servers, skills and plugins, applies allow, warn and block rules on the device, and gives employees an approved catalog of servers, toolkits and skills through company groups. Publication checks review what the organization distributes, and approval before selected tool calls keeps consequential actions under human review. Discovery, enforcement, distribution and audit sit in one product.

CyberArk approaches agents as privileged identities. Palo Alto Networks completed its acquisition of CyberArk in February 2026, and the platform now carries the Idira name, combining privileged access management with machine and agentic identity security. Idira Secure AI Agents scans SaaS, cloud and developer environments for agents, grants them access only for the duration of a task, and logs their actions.

Both products put a control point between agents and MCP tools. The difference is the job each one is built for. Idira starts from the privileged access program and treats each agent as an identity to vault, broker and revoke. Willow starts from the employee and the AI capabilities they use, and governs those capabilities from installation to every call.

How Willow and CyberArk (Idira) compare

Willow vs CyberArk (Idira)

willow
Security task Willow CyberArk (Idira)
Discover AI agents and tools Scan Agent finds MCP configurations, skills, plugins and instruction files on employee devices. Scans SaaS, cloud and developer environments for active agents and adds ownership and permission context.
Endpoint and access enforcement Allow, warn or block MCP servers and skills by group, user or device; blocks are reversible. Agent Identity Broker acts as the enforcement point and can deny access as a kill switch.
Control MCP tools Per-tool availability, runtime guards and human approval on every call to a marked tool. Access policies restrict which MCP tools a given agent may run.
Credential model Machine users with access keys, human owners and rotatable secrets; Vault stores connector secrets. Just-in-time access with zero standing privileges; credentials are not exposed to the agent.
Distribute approved capabilities Groups deliver approved MCP servers, toolkits, skills and plugins; publication guards review content. Automated ownership workflows and lifecycle management for agent identities.
Protect employee clients Guard Hooks in Claude Code, Cursor and Codex; beta Prompt Guard for browser AI chats. Brokers JIT access through MCP servers for Claude-built agents.
Deployment SaaS, hybrid, or full on-premises with no runtime dependency on Willow SaaS. Available within Palo Alto Networks and as a standalone platform.

The overlap sits at MCP tool access. Around it, the products diverge. Willow pairs that access control with device policy, an approved catalog, publication review and guards inside the coding clients and browsers employees use. Idira pairs it with vaulting, just-in-time privilege and a privileged access program built for infrastructure. For MCP tool calls routed through Willow's Gateway, admins can require human approval on every invocation of selected tools. Runtime guards inspect requests and responses passing through the Gateway.

Where Willow leads?

Govern what employees install, not only what agents access

An agent's behavior is shaped before it ever requests access. An MCP server added to Cursor, a skill installed in Claude Code or a CLAUDE.md file with standing instructions all change what it will try to do. Willow's Scan Agent inventories those capabilities on each device and enforces policy rules there.

Findings become allow, warn and block rules scoped to everyone, specific groups, users or devices. A block rewrites the MCP entry to a local Willow endpoint or renames the skill file, and the agent restores the original when the rule is removed. Willow can also push approved agent configuration to Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and GitHub Copilot, currently in beta, so every developer starts from a governed setup.

An approved catalog that makes the safe path the easy path

Removing standing privilege reduces blast radius. Adoption still needs approved tools people want to use. Willow groups decide which MCP servers, toolkits and skills each employee can use, organizational skills sync from GitHub and bundle into plugins, and SCIM keeps users and groups aligned with the identity provider.

Review shared capabilities before distribution

Willow's build-time guards check tool selections, embedded prompts, skill text and command definitions before a toolkit or plugin is published. If the content violates a configured policy, the publish is blocked. A well-brokered credential cannot make a harmful skill safe; publication review stops it before it spreads.

Human approval on consequential calls

Willow supports tool-level availability and human approval before selected tools run. A team can keep read operations open, disable write tools, and require confirmation for a sensitive invocation. Approval applies to every call to a tool marked for it, and runtime guards inspect each call before it reaches the MCP server and each response before it returns. That puts least privilege for AI agents at the level of individual actions.

Guards inside coding clients and browser chats

Willow's Guard Hooks evaluate every user prompt and file-tool call in Claude Code, Cursor and Codex before the agent acts; they fail open on a timeout or outage. Prompt Guard applies the same guards to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Microsoft 365 Copilot and DeepSeek in Chrome and Edge. The extension is in beta and an admin turns interception on.

Audit, posture and deployment in one place

Request logs record the user, agent, server, tool, outcome and guard decision for each request Willow handles, and Radar scores AI security risk across identity, shadow AI, data exposure, agents and monitoring. Machine users carry accountable human owners, and the Vault keeps connector secrets out of configurations. Willow deploys as SaaS, hybrid or full on-premises.

When CyberArk (Idira) is the right choice

Idira fits organizations that already run CyberArk for privileged access and want agents under the same program:

  • Routing agent actions through the Agent Identity Broker for just-in-time access to enterprise resources, with zero standing privileges and credentials never exposed to the agent.
  • Using a kill switch to deny access when an agent behaves unexpectedly, and attributing agent actions to the user they acted for.
  • Enforcing MCP tool access policies that tie users, the agents they operate through and specific MCP tools together, and issuing short-lived SPIFFE identities to supported cloud agents.
  • Combining agent controls with privileged access management, endpoint privilege, secrets management and identity governance for human and machine identities.

Idira also underpins Palo Alto Networks' Agent Identity Security add-on for Prisma AIRS AI Gateway, which federates enterprise identity providers through Idira. Teams standardizing on Palo Alto Networks may meet these capabilities through either product.

What they cost and where they run

As of 28 October 2026, Willow lists a $0 Free plan and Enterprise pricing per human seat, billed annually, with volume tiers. Enterprise includes shadow AI discovery across the fleet, runtime guardrails, browser prompt guards and SCIM, and Willow can be purchased through AWS Marketplace. Willow deploys as SaaS, hybrid or full on-premises, with no runtime dependency on Willow SaaS in the on-premises model.

Idira does not list pricing; its pages route buyers to a demo or a free agentic identity assessment. Palo Alto Networks states that CyberArk solutions remain available as a standalone platform after the acquisition.

Should you run both?

In organizations with an established CyberArk program, a combined model is reasonable. Idira keeps brokering privileged access for agents that reach production infrastructure and databases. Willow governs the employee layer: which MCP servers, skills and plugins run on each laptop, which approved tools each group receives, which shared capabilities pass review, and which tool calls need a person to approve them.

Where both control MCP tool access, assign one owner per server to avoid duplicate policy. For organizations without a CyberArk deployment, Willow covers discovery, device enforcement, distribution, approvals and audit for employee AI in one product.

Choosing between Willow and CyberArk (Idira)

Which Product Fits the Requirement

willow
Primary requirement Product to consider Why it fits
Govern the MCP servers, skills and plugins employees install. Willow Local discovery with scoped, reversible allow, warn and block rules.
Give employees an approved catalog of AI tools. Willow Group-based access to servers, toolkits and skills, with publication guards.
Require a person to approve selected tool calls. Willow Approval on every call to a tool marked for review.
Guard prompts in coding clients and browser chats. Willow Guard Hooks and Prompt Guard reuse the same runtime guards.
Broker just-in-time privileged access for agents. CyberArk (Idira) Agent Identity Broker with zero standing privileges.
Extend an existing CyberArk PAM program to agents. CyberArk (Idira) Agent controls alongside PAM, secrets and identity governance.

Idira brings privileged access discipline to agents. Willow brings governed AI adoption to employees: what runs on each device, what people receive, what needs review and what every call did. To see Willow on your own tools, book a demo or start on the Free plan.

Frequently asked questions

Is CyberArk the same company as Idira?

Yes. Palo Alto Networks completed its acquisition of CyberArk in February 2026, and the platform now carries the Idira name, described as built on CyberArk's legacy and powered by Palo Alto Networks. Existing CyberArk customers keep using the platform.

Can both products control which MCP tools an agent uses?

Yes. Idira access policies restrict which MCP tools a given agent may run. Willow controls tool availability per server instance, can require human approval on every call to a selected tool, and also governs the MCP servers and skills installed locally on employee devices.

Does Willow replace privileged access management?

No. Willow is not a PAM platform. It governs employee AI tools, skills and tool calls, with machine users, a Vault for connector secrets and full audit. Organizations with PAM requirements for infrastructure can keep Idira for that layer.

How do they handle coding agents such as Claude Code?

Willow Guard Hooks evaluate prompts and file-tool calls in Claude Code, Cursor and Codex, and the Scan Agent discovers their MCP servers, skills and plugins. Idira authenticates Claude-built agents and provides just-in-time access through MCP servers via its Agent Identity Broker.

Can Willow run inside company infrastructure?

Yes. Full on-premises deployment runs every Willow component in the customer's Kubernetes cluster, with no dependency on Willow SaaS at runtime.

‍

‍

Table of contents

    Willow vs Microsoft Entra Agent ID

    Microsoft Entra Agent ID manages agent identities, Conditional Access, and lifecycle governance. Willow governs employee AI tools with MCP discovery, device policies, approved skills and plugins, and human approval for sensitive actions.

    ‍

    Willow vs JumpCloud

    JumpCloud manages identities, devices, SSO, and agent access through Agentic IAM. Willow governs employee AI tools with MCP discovery, device policies, approved skills and plugins, runtime security, and human approval for sensitive actions.

    ‍

    Willow vs Netskope for AI Agent Security

    Netskope protects AI traffic and sensitive data through MCP policies, DLP, and endpoint discovery. Willow governs employee AI tools with MCP discovery, device policies, approved skills and plugins, and human approval for sensitive actions.

    ‍

    Your agents are already in the wild.

    Give them a Basecamp. Go from AI chaos to AI work, in minutes.